Background Image
Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  31 / 308 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 31 / 308 Next Page
Page Background

31

The History of the Department

At the time of the dispute between theoreticians and

practitioners at the Technical University of Munich, the

teaching of mathematics was also adjusted to the needs

of the engineers. The university was therefore following a

path of beneficial compromise and was able to go some

way to meeting the demands of the ‘Aachen resolutions’.

In 1895, mechanical engineer Egbert von Hoyer was made

Director of the Technical University of Munich. While he

was not a radical defender of the rights of the practition-

ers, he did commit to increasing

the practical element in the teach-

ing programme in Munich. Walther

von Dyck, Professor of Mathemat-

ics at the Technical University of

Munich, was outraged: ‘The mere

suspicion that someone wishes

to teach more than simply pure

practical applications is sufficient

to severely impair our mission.’

Together with mathematicians from

other technical universities, as well

as mathematics-oriented engineers, he did all he could to

convince the ‘practitioners’ of the benefits of a basic edu-

cation in mathematics. He succeeded in retaining mathe-

matics as a basic science in mechanical engineering.

The dispute flared up again when during the 1898/1899

university year, technical physics was introduced as

a subject in the general department. Rudolf Diesel

expressed his admiration for the idea: ‘What a wonderful,

new field; that has attracted too little attention to date’.

The development was not met with much appreciation by

mechanical engineering professors Paul von Lossow and

Otto von Grove. In their view, the technical departments

alone should be responsible for educating engineers who

would later work in the industrial sector.

The dispute between theoreticians and practitioners

died down at the turn of the century. Both sides were

given the right to award doctorates. Also, after 1895, the

laboratories were made subordinate to the theoretical

mechanical engineering faculty. In this way, the position of

the theoreticians was strengthened instead of that of the

practitioners as had been expected.

Walther von Dyck, 1899

1895

The Dispute Between

Theoreticians and Practitioners

When professors of German higher education institutions,

including the well-known cinematographer and mechan-

ical engineer Franz Reuleaux – the academic teacher of

Carl von Linde – visited the World Exhibition in Chicago in

1893, they were presented with the USA as a forerunner in

technical sciences. The German higher education teach-

ers visited the large machine and electrical technology

laboratories and sat in on teaching units with demon-

strations and experiments. They took these impressions

back to Germany with them, and in 1895, together with

the Association of German Engineers, (Verein Deutscher

Ingenieure, or VDI), they wrote the ‘Aachen resolutions’.

In these resolutions, the professors of mechanical

engineering demanded the construction of modern

laboratories and a practical orientation in teaching and

study. The basic subjects such as mathematics should

be downgraded to auxiliary sciences. According to the

authors of the resolutions, the teaching at the technical

universities was too theoretical. Young engineers received

extensive tuition in mathematics, while experiments and

practical tests were a rarity. The German mathematicians

resisted these demands. They stressed the importance

of mathematics as a basic science and warned against

making research and teaching too application-oriented

and superficial.

Members of the Munich Technical University also got

involved. At that time, the Department of Mechanical Engi-

neering has its own machine laboratory. Carl von Linde

had established the laboratory in 1875, around 20 years

earlier than at other technical universities in Germany.

Linde had taken on the idea from the ETH Zürich, separat-

ing the teaching of mechanical engineering from machine

construction and dividing the teaching into descriptive

and theoretical mechanical engineering. While descriptive

teaching overlapped with some areas of machine con-

struction, the theoretical teaching of mechanical engi-

neering comprised three focal content areas – kinematics,

engines and mechanical heat theory. With this approach,

Linde created the precursors of kinematics and hydraulics,

refrigeration technology and thermodynamics as subjects.

Fundamental Research vs. Applied Research